Organisational health

In one paragraph

A business can be smart — good strategy, good finance, good marketing — and still lose to a less clever competitor that has minimal politics, clear direction and low turnover.

Smart is the technical half: strategy, marketing, finance, technology. It is what business education concentrates on and what management spends its time on, because it is measurable and interesting.

Healthy is the other half: minimal politics, minimal confusion, high morale, high productivity, low turnover. Harder to measure and, Lencioni argues, the larger untapped advantage.

Why health gets ignored

It has no obvious metric, no consultant deliverable and no quarter in which it visibly pays off. So it loses every time it competes for attention with something urgent — the same failure as [governing versus managing].

The symptoms are cheap to spot: meetings where the real conversation happens afterwards, the same decision being made three times, people who cannot say what the priority is.

How to actually use it

• Ask the team to write down the top priority for this quarter, separately. If the answers differ, you have a clarity problem and no strategy will survive it.
• Count how often a decision gets revisited. Repeated decisions are the clearest sign of an unhealthy organisation and they are countable.

Where it breaks down

• Health without competence is a pleasant place to work that goes out of business. It is an *and*, not an *instead of*.

More on leadership