Herzberg's two-factor theory

In one paragraph

Frederick Herzberg found that satisfaction and dissatisfaction come from different sources — so fixing what people complain about does not motivate them, it just stops them complaining.

Hygiene factors are pay, conditions, company policy, supervision, job security and relationships. Get them wrong and people are actively dissatisfied. Get them right and people are simply *not dissatisfied*, which is not the same as motivated.

Motivators are achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility and advancement. These are what actually produce satisfaction and effort.

This is the counter-intuitive bit and the reason the theory is examined so often. Pay is a hygiene factor. Fixing bad pay removes a problem; it does not create motivation.

Job enrichment

Herzberg's prescription follows directly: if motivators live in the work itself, then redesign the work. Job enrichment means giving people more responsibility and control over a complete piece of work — as opposed to job enlargement, which is simply more tasks of the same kind, and does little.

How to actually use it

• Split your last round of staff complaints into the two lists. If it is all hygiene, fixing it buys you a calmer workplace and no extra effort — plan the motivator work separately.
• Give one person end-to-end ownership of something small and real. That is enrichment, and it costs nothing.

Where it breaks down

• Based on interviews with professionals — engineers and accountants — and it transfers less well to low-paid or insecure work, where pay is emphatically not just hygiene.
• People attribute good outcomes to themselves and bad ones to circumstances, which may partly explain the two lists.

If you are being examined on it

The mark is usually in the distinction: hygiene prevents dissatisfaction, motivators create satisfaction. Say it explicitly, then apply.

More on people & teams