HomeModels › Ethics, purpose & sustainability
Ethics, purpose & sustainability

Ethics, CSR and sustainability

Doing the right thing, what it costs, and how to tell it apart from saying you do.

GCSEGCSE Business — Influences on business / MBA (HBS Purpose of the Firm, Manchester Leading Global Transitions)
Also called: corporate social responsibility, triple bottom line, greenwashing, ESG

In one paragraph

Whether a business considers its effect on people and the environment alongside profit — and whether that costs money or makes it.

Business ethics is about right and wrong in commercial decisions: how suppliers are paid, how staff are treated, how honestly you sell. Corporate social responsibility is the broader idea that a business has obligations to society beyond its shareholders.

The triple bottom line proposes measuring three results rather than one: profit, people and planet.

The genuine tension

Ethical choices frequently cost money in the short term — paying suppliers fairly, better materials, higher wages, refusing profitable work. The argument for them is partly moral and partly commercial: reputation, staff retention, customer loyalty and reduced regulatory risk.

Both halves are true, and the honest version admits the trade-off rather than claiming that doing good is always profitable. Sometimes it is simply the price of being able to look at yourself.

Greenwashing — claiming environmental credentials you do not have — is now a legal risk as well as a reputational one, and customers and regulators have got considerably better at spotting it.

How to actually use it

  • Pick the areas where your actual behaviour is already good and say so specifically, with evidence. Specific and modest beats broad and unverifiable.
  • Before making a claim, ask whether you could defend it to a journalist with your records in front of you.

Where it breaks down

  • CSR spending is easy to announce and hard to measure, and can become a marketing line detached from how the business actually operates.
  • There is real disagreement about whether managers should pursue anything beyond shareholder returns — that argument is a live one, not settled.

If you are being examined on it

Give the cost as well as the benefit. Answers that treat ethics as free score badly; the trade-off is the analysis.